Forums

By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. If you have left the first and last name fields blank on your member profile, your email address will be displayed instead.

All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Remaining questions from PSMI (PO+Fire Member)
Last Post 28 Jan 2014 06:14 AM by Sergej Werfel. 4 Replies.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Sergej Werfel
New Member
New Member
Posts:2
Sergej Werfel

--
24 Jan 2014 03:54 AM
    After my PSM assessment there are still some unclear things. I don't fully remember the questions and answers, but that is what I want to know:

    1. Which task better fits to the PO role?
    - Provide Feedback
    - To advise with stakeholders

    => I'm sure, that both is quite important. First the PO must explain all questions and details of the PBIs to the DevTeam. Otherwise they cannot work. Second the PO represents the interests of all stakeholders, so he/she must know what they want and explain it to the team if necessary. But answering that question I must select one of them (there were also other answers that I has excluded)

    2. One person makes problems in the DevTeam, who can fire that person?
    - DevTeam
    - Management
    - s.o. else

    => Here it was difficult to decide. In my opinion the DevTeam should talk about the problem and try to resolve it as a self-organizing group. If this is not possible they should try to satisfy the person to go by itself. The DevTeam has not the rights to fire a member, but the decision should come from them. The only one who is able to fire a person (or to assign it to an other team) is the management (independent on scrum). So here it is quite difficult to select the "right" answer. For scrum I would answer DevTeam, but this is unrealistic because of laws or working contracts.


    What do you think about the upper questions?
    Ian Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1451
    Ian Mitchell

    --
    24 Jan 2014 06:39 AM
    1. I'd go for "provide feedback", on the grounds that this is most clearly of value to the rest of the Scrum Team. "Advising stakeholders" is less precise in terms of the value a PO would be expected to provide as a Scrum Team member. Then again, "advising stakeholders" could be seen to encompass the provision of feedback, so it is indeed a tricky one.

    2. I think you're spot on. I cannot disagree with either your analysis or your conclusion.
    Ilia Pavlichenko
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:71
    Ilia Pavlichenko

    --
    24 Jan 2014 07:31 AM
    Agree with Ian.
    I'd add that Development Team is self-organising, but not self-managed (which would mean they can fire, recruit, pay bonuses). There's a slight difference here.
    Olivier Ledru
    Basic Member
    Basic Member
    Posts:209
    Olivier Ledru

    --
    24 Jan 2014 03:14 PM
    The Managers are responsible for the boundaries of the team.
    Even in the context of Scrum, you'll have some kind of managers, who are able to hire, pay and fire people if necessary.
    Sergej Werfel
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:2
    Sergej Werfel

    --
    28 Jan 2014 06:14 AM
    Thank you for your answers. Especially Illya for clarifying self-organizing and self-managed.
    You are not authorized to post a reply.


    Feedback