Forums

By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. If you have left the first and last name fields blank on your member profile, your email address will be displayed instead.

All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Risk in SCRUM vs. risk in Waterfall
Last Post 24 Feb 2014 03:07 AM by Bhuvan Misra. 3 Replies.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Paweł Nowak
New Member
New Member
Posts:2
Paweł Nowak

--
24 Feb 2014 01:01 AM
    Hi, in materials for PSPO 1 course, there is a picture showing how risk changes over time in SCRUM and Waterfall. I am not sure if I am understand it correctly, because i think that risk in Waterfall increases over time, not decreases. Could you tell me how to interpret this drawing? Thanks :) (Red is waterfall, green is SCRUM)
    Ian Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1535
    Ian Mitchell

    --
    24 Feb 2014 01:20 AM
    I think this chart might be showing the risk of not delivering a satisfactory system at all. This is not a risk that will increase over time because the system doesn't exist in the first place. You can't get worse than nothing, even with a waterfall approach.

    A waterfall process will reduce the risk of non-delivery only gradually. You can expect a big release at the end, which is where most of the risk ends up being mitigated. That's what the red line shows.

    An agile process will reduce the risk incrementally with a view to mitigating it as quickly as possible. That's what the greenish-yellow line shows.

    Assuming I'm interpreting the chart correctly, the really important thing to get out of it is the surface area below each of the two curves. That's the total risk exposure, and it's less in an agile way of working than it is in waterfall.
    Paweł Nowak
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:2
    Paweł Nowak

    --
    24 Feb 2014 01:35 AM
    Hi Ian, thanks a lot for your reply. The intention behind this picture looks more clearly for me right now :)
    Bhuvan Misra
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:21
    Bhuvan Misra

    --
    24 Feb 2014 03:07 AM
    I'm not sure if my response is completely relevant. Let me post it anyways :-)

    “Cone of Uncertainty” can be better dealt with Agile than with Waterfall. The impact of any Uncertainty is contained and discovered sooner than later in the Agile/Scrum world.

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/lib....120).aspx
    You are not authorized to post a reply.


    Feedback