Forums

By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. If you have left the first and last name fields blank on your member profile, your email address will be displayed instead.

All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

what to do if PO is not doing his job?
Last Post 01 Jun 2014 09:40 AM by Tom Alal. 5 Replies.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Mano Chang
New Member
New Member
Posts:2
Mano Chang

--
26 Mar 2014 07:29 AM
    Hi, i got the following questions at the PSM1 which i failed at 82.5%, can you help giving your view?

    what to do as a Scrum Master if PO is not doing his job (had handed the Prodcuct backlog to the DT, but no help is provided in giving details on the items, etc). ? (multi-response)

    a/ coach him,
    b/ discuss that during the Sprint Retrospective,
    c/ stop the project,
    d/ inform the PO functional line manager.

    I would chose a/, b/ and d/, but i am not sure whether SC can complain outside of the scrum framework.

    Ian Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1676
    Ian Mitchell

    --
    26 Mar 2014 07:40 AM
    Ownership of the process should belong to the Scrum Team and no-one else. This means that a team should be able to remove its own impediments, and should not need to escalate them to anyone else for resolution. Coaching, and inspection and adaptation through retrospectives, are good ways to achieve this.
    Mano Chang
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:2
    Mano Chang

    --
    26 Mar 2014 11:04 PM
    Thanks Ian. that helps alots
    Garin Reyneke
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:21
    Garin Reyneke

    --
    28 May 2014 04:10 PM
    ironically I also got 82.5% , and every time I've done the open assessment I've had the Scrum Master is a management role question marked wrong in a Utopian world maybe, but when you have to implement scrum from the ground up and then bit by bit get the pieces of the framework in place, which includes labouring to have a PO role appointed for your Scrum team, what is the reality that the divisional manager will simply just leave this in the teams hands to deal with ? Scrum is hard, but worth it ... but that said , not all scrum masters are appointed into roles where the framework is correctly in place to begin with. When fundamental steps have been missed in the implementation of scrum, and the dev team already feel like they have just had a new way of working imposed on them, these are real issues that scrum masters sometimes face, and I really feel that this exam shouldn't be aimed at such a wide variety of these ... some of these questions are related to enterprise level projects , with teams working with independent project portions that require integration phases.
    Ian Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1676
    Ian Mitchell

    --
    29 May 2014 12:10 AM
    In Scrum management is a collaborative responsibility and not a role. It's quite valid to talk about "management" and "managing" in the context of a self-organizing team. In effect, every team member occupies a management position in some capacity.

    As a very general rule, if you encounter the term "manager" (implying a role), or see reference being made to management as a role, you should be a bit suspicious.
    Tom Alal
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:5
    Tom Alal

    --
    01 Jun 2014 09:40 AM
    Well, I agree with most of the facts that have been pointed out by these members regarding the roles/responsibilities of the Scrum Team in this situation. However, I would like to point out that as much as it is a collective responsibility in Scrum Team, it is also clear that each component of the Scrum Team must play its role to support the frame work. By this, I mean the PO, SM, or the Development team each must play its part for the Scrum framework to make sense. Therefore, in this situation, SM should couch the PO on the importance of the Scrum team working together to support the framework.
    You are not authorized to post a reply.


    Feedback