Skip to main content

Due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we have paused all purchases and training in and from Russia.

The Product Owner asks the Scrum Master's recommendation; when the the Scrum Team waits for a specific component software which has to be supplied by external supplier & without that there wouldn't be enough work for the Development Team to perform

Last post 09:14 pm October 17, 2021 by Reshma Anand
5 replies
03:55 pm December 14, 2020

The Product Owner asks the Scrum Master's recommendation; when the the Scrum Team waits for a specific component software which has to be supplied by external supplier & without that there wouldn't be enough work for the Development Team to perform in the next Sprint. 

As a Scrum Master what would you opine to the Product Owner?

 

> Make the Product Owner to Recall that his one of the responsibility is to maintain a consistent flow of value which must reflect in the ordering of the Product Backlog items

 

> Recommend the Product Owner to re-order the Product Backlog items so that the work that needs the involvement of specific component software can be taken up in the next Sprint

 

> Recommend the Product Owner to order the Product Backlog items in such a way that it maximizes the utilization of Development team effort

 

Note - I feel the 2nd option makes sense, what's your point of view!

 

 


10:26 pm December 14, 2020

If a Product Owner is accountable for maximizing value, do you still think the 2nd option is best? If so, can you explain why?


10:33 pm December 14, 2020

The Product Owner asks the Scrum Master's recommendation; when the the Scrum Team waits for a specific component software which has to be supplied by external supplier & without that there wouldn't be enough work for the Development Team to perform in the next Sprint. 

What would that tell you about the effectiveness and timeliness of Product Backlog refinement, if this dependency was uncovered just before the next Sprint?


06:41 pm January 23, 2021

The first answer is the correct one.  Another point that is not mentioned though is that the SM should then coach the PO on their scrum responsibilities.


03:04 pm May 11, 2021

If going beyond these few possible answers, what would be the best recommendation?

I would say that PO should bear in mind that her main concern is value, but the same time she should reflect the external dependency (potential delay of component) in the backlog order, right?

 


02:30 pm October 17, 2021

no where in the scrum guide it mentions that the Scrum Master TELLs the Product Owner what to do so and what he cant so His job is totally to remind the Product Owner that his job is to represent the flow of VALUE !!


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.