Skip to main content

Inspiration from Outside the Scrum World

February 19, 2019

 

The Subtle Art of Not Giving a FckI am listening to the audiobook “The subtle art of not giving fck” from Mark Manson and I am learning awesome things that can relate to our world of “Agile” and “Product Ownership.” The style of the writing doesn’t suit me well, but I can appreciate many points he's making. 

The book defends a position on how to choose and prioritize the things we give a fck about. Curiously, I find it connects with Product Owners and Scrum Teams. Here's how. 

Entitlement

“When you think you deserve to be treated as special or deserve something special. That happens when you think you are way more awesome than everybody else, or you think that everybody else is way more special than you are.”

This is a common team dysfunction, also seeing across the organization at any level. Have you observed this during an Agile transition? How did that go? How do you help with the situation at hand? Mark explains that's BS, you are not special and I like that idea. 

Values

Just like described in the Scrum Guide, the author defines a set of 5 values, helping to guide your decisions on what to give your fck. Here they are: “Radical Form of Responsibility, Uncertainty, Failure, Rejection, Contemplation of One's Mortality.” I find these are appealing for a Product Owner. Let’s see why.

Radical Form of Responsibility

"... Taking responsibility for everything that occurs in your life, regardless of who's at fault...”. For me, this translates to my definition of “professionalism.” Professionals won't be giving much attention to the person who's at fault, they will focus on creating a quality, working software. The 'blame game” doesn't work well in a complex environment when solutions need to emerge from a cross-functional team.

Uncertainty

"... The acknowledgment of your own ignorance and the cultivation of constant doubt in your own beliefs.

For me, this translates into doing experiments and proving or disproving the hypothesis formulated when deciding what to build. You don't know how much value it will bring. The only thing you know is what happened in the past. Use uncertainty to your advantage, experiment and learn!

Failure

"... The willingness to discover your own flaws and mistakes and that maybe they can be improved upon.

You now understand that I see Product Owners as scientists. They formulate a hypothesis, deciding what to build in order to have an impact on some customers and therefore fulfill a goal. In that case, embrace the feedback, good and bad. Especially the bad ones, those are the ones that will kick you outside your comfort zone and hopefully will get you more creative than ever.

Rejection

The ability to both say and hear ‘no’ thus clearly defining what you will or will not accept in your life.

In the life of a professional, that's a no brainer to translate. Saying yes to everything is lying knowing that you won't be able to fulfill your all your promises. And lying is not being in good standing with your values. We hire professionals, we are professionals because we have the right knowledge to say 'no' in due time. Product Owners will say 'no' when ordering their Product Backlog, they will say 'no' when a detractor asks for something irrelevant.

Contemplation of one's own mortality

"... Paying attention to one's own death is perhaps the only thing capable of helping us keep our other values in proper perspective.”

Whoa, this is a deep one! Take this to the team and ask the question: “How can we ‘be’ to ensure we deliver quality software and keep this software in its best shape? If we get dissolved tomorrow, how would you like to remember us?" Take this to the Product Owner: What will you build if you had only one iteration? What's the “wow” effect?

How would you take this to your organization?

Importance of the right metrics

Mark Manson also talks about metrics and how some of them won't help you much and will give you a false sense of success. In his book, he describes these metrics as “extrinsic.” Better metrics are the ones he calls “intrinsic,” they come from inside you. How do you measure success? The metrics are important. While teaching Professional Scrum Product Owners, we use the Evidence-Based Management to explain what better metrics would be to measure and improve over time.

I am not done listening to the audiobook. I was just so excited while hearing the first few chapters and I wanted to share my observations on how I relate this surprising audiobook to the Agile world. I may be biased having my head in the ‘Agile World ‘constantly, but darn, it just makes sense to me. Just like other stuff, I read around big wall rock climbing and that’s another story!

Scrum On!

Simon

 


What did you think about this post?

Comments (4)


panait ciprian
07:19 am February 20, 2019

Agile is developpers taking responsibility for decissions made by managers and for colleagues that underperform which as a result will be rewarded and promoted for undeperforming because feels are more important than getting shit done. Ahile is a cancer and Scrum is its worst form. How is giving a ton of reports empowering is beyond me but again in this insane world everything is possible. One thing remains constant though : most end customers started refusing products build with Agile. Lots of companies will go bankrupt due to this cancer but I wonder if managers will realize their mistakes.


Simon Bourk
02:56 am February 22, 2019

Thanks Panait for taking the time to comment.

While reading your text, I can't stop thinking you pointed out most of the harshest dysfunctions we see while implementing Scrum and/or other "Agile Frameworks" in organizations whom are coming from a strong hierarchical and self-promoted environment. For example, developers taking responsibility for decisions made by “disconnected” managers, being “promoted” over team performance.

I’d invite you to research the model “Spiral Dynamics”. I’m not an expert with that model, I just find it fascinating how it describes different meme in the evolution of our society and how we can map it to our current environment at work; From Taylorism to the emergence of the Agile Mindset. If you read more on the topic, you’ll notice one Blue organization wouldn’t be able to even comprehend the Agile mindset due to too many levels of separations and it would definitively lead to Bankruptcy. On that note, and to support your observation, these managers won't even consider the idea of "inspect and adapt".

Of course, you are right about being like a Cancer. This "Agile" is spreading fast and people like it, it works for them and they promote their successes worldwide, myself included. Also, I want to support your point made about Bankruptcy. While delivering bad product faster and sweeping away any feedback, or even worst, not asking for feedback, one organization may end up in bankruptcy. That's not what "Agile" is although it is a common dysfunction we see while being flaccid at its implementation.

To be honest, and this is my opinion, it would be great if the companies who are unable to build Quality Products in due time while caring about their customers go Bankrupt. No one wants bad products and their employees would probably want to work somewhere else.

That said, I bet you’d like the book I am referring to in my article; “The subtle art of not giving a fck”.


Ron Eringa
04:17 pm February 22, 2019

Hey guys, interesting discussion you are having over here.

@panaitciprian:disqus The message you are bringing addresses a problem that many Agile implementations are having. We 'implement' Scrum only on the IT department or in the teams that build the products, but we forget to change the leadership around the teams. It's like installing the latest version of Office365 on a system that still runs Windows95. At some point in time this leads to frustration and friction (that I can clearly hear in your convictions and anekdotes).

@simonbourk:disqus I guess what you are trying to point out is that there is a reason why organizations implement Agile and\or Scrum. The world is no longer a place where 1 manager can come up with a plan, have the workers executive and all will end well. It has become a place where you have to adapt or die (and that last process might take us a few years, but it will happen someday). However we cannot expect that organizations who are designed with that '1 plan by the manager'-approach to install a new state of the art operating system overnight. While in some large corporates it may never happen, in some organizations this takes a lot of time, since we've been using the old system already for 100 years. Until now, I have only seen small organizations make this shift quite fast.

We are on the verge of a new paradigm shift and this idea is not new. Toyota's Takeuchi & Nonaka described the managerial implications of a new operation like Scrum already in 1986. Just browse down to the 'Managerial Implications' part of this article in the Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/1986/01/the...
Many Scrum implementations have forgotten these managerial implications or weren't even aware of them in the first place. This change of leadership style will only happen when organizations can no longer serve their customers or be successful with their old leadership model (indicated by the blue or orange model in Spiral Dynamics).

Long story short, I think you have 3 choices:
- stay with the dinosaurs, complain about it and wait for the extinction
- accept that it might take another decade until leaders will shift their thinking (Mark Manson suggests that everyone has to go through this stage and I think, in a way, he is right about it)
- become a leader yourself and start experimenting

If the last choice sounds most appealing, then Spiral Dynamics (or Laloux's book Reinventing Organizations is definitely a good starting point).


Matt Callcut
03:38 pm February 25, 2019

I, too, have found a lot of inspiration from outside the Scrum world, oddly enough through the practice of Yoga, or, more accurately, through my wife's practice of Yoga. I urge you to check out the actual readings on Yoga (not just the modern practice of it); I think you'll find it amazingly compatible.

I'd also like to briefly address the "uncertainty" value you discovered and translated. I find that I agree with your statement:

The acknowledgment of your own ignorance and the cultivation of constant doubt in your own beliefs.

This is one of those ways of being/doing that I take a great deal of solace from (since I defintely cultivate constant doubt!), yet am also beaten regularly with this stick: "There's no room for doubt". Leaders are right, regardless of whether they actually are (which, naturally, is a problem)! It's ego driven, and I struggle against this constantly. How do you get others, particularly those in positions of power, to lead in a egoless way and, as you state, to cultivate constant doubt in their own beliefs?