Skip to main content

Why Employing Agile Coaches next to Scrum Masters Is Unnecessary

June 20, 2023

TL; DR: Employing Agile Coaches next to Scrum Masters?

Often, when organizations employ agile coaches and Scrum Masters, we can observe that agile coaches work at an organizational level. In contrast, Scrum Masters work in a tactical role at the team level in a “delivery manager capacity,” which defies the Scrum Guide’s concept of accountabilities.

However, if you take Scrum seriously, this approach has no upside. Here are eight reasons for empowering your Scrum Masters to work with the organization. 

Disclaimer: I acknowledge, though, that “agile coach” is a helpful keyword for positioning yourself as an agile practitioner; potential employers and clients search for this term.

Why Employing Agile Coaches next to Scrum Masters Is Unnecessary

🏅 The most popular discussion on LinkedIn this week wasIntroducing: The #MinimumViableLibrary — #ProductOwner edition!

🗞 Shall I notify you about articles like this one? Awesome! You can sign up here for the ‘Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter and join 47,000-plus subscribers.

🎓 🇬🇧 Join your peers for an advanced Scrum Master class: August 29-30, 2023: Professional Scrum Master II.

📖 Get notified when the Scrum Anti-Patterns Guide book is available!

The Origin of Separating the Roles of Agile Coaches and Scrum Masters

The Agile journey is not a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Different organizations will require different strategies for effective Agile transformation, given their unique circumstances, culture, and history. Moreover, the goal of adopting Agile and Scrum is not about implementing a new set of practices or roles but rather about fostering a culture that values collaboration, responsiveness to change, and continuous improvement to reap a competitive advantage. After all, we are not paid to practice Scrum but solve our customers’ problems within the given constraints while contributing to the organization’s sustainability.

The puzzling question is why adopt an approach — here: separating both roles — which has no upside but probably many downsides? Some reasons for this attitude may be the following:

  • Lack of Agile Understanding: Misunderstanding of agile principles often results in organizations defaulting to existing management styles and splitting roles, contradicting the Agile Manifesto’s principles of valuing collaboration and responding to change over following a plan.
  • Fear of Change: Distinguishing between agile coaches and Scrum Masters can reflect resistance to the culture shift that Agile introduces. Consequently, some organizations transitioning from traditional practice may retain existing hierarchies and roles. They inadvertently create a distinction between agile coaches and Scrum Masters, contravening the Scrum Guide’s intention of flattening hierarchies and promoting self-organization.
  • Scaling Misconception: When scaling Scrum, organizations often employ agile coaches to drive organizational change, while Scrum Masters work with individual teams. Contrary to the Agile Manifesto’s emphasis on individuals and interactions, this practice can stem from an erroneous belief that large-scale change requires distinct roles and accountabilities.
  • Misinterpretation of Roles: The Scrum Guide defines the Scrum Master as a servant-leader for the Scrum Team and the organization. However, organizations may mistake this as a tactical role focused on the team level rather than understanding the broader strategic implications, including coaching the organization in Scrum adoption.

In my experience, most issues that prevent a Scrum team from becoming good at what they do — here: creating value for customers while contributing to the organization’s sustainability — originate at the organizational level. You will fail as Scrum Master if you do not consider that and limit yourself to the tactical team level.

Maybe, it is just collateral damage from the growing popularity of SAFe®?

Download the 60 Scrum Master Interview Questions to Identify Suitable Candidates

8 Reasons Why Employing Agile Coaches next to Scrum Masters Is Unnecessary

Here is my list of why employing Agile coaches next to Scrum Masters is unnecessary if you take Scrum seriously:

  1. Process Over People: Employing agile coaches could lead to overemphasizing processes and methodologies, whereas the Agile Manifesto emphasizes the importance of valuing individuals and interactions over processes and tools.
  2. Overlap of Responsibilities: There may be some overlap between the responsibilities of agile coaches and Scrum Masters, leading to confusion and potential redundancy in their roles.
  3. Internal Coaching: Organizations can consider developing internal coaching capabilities among existing Scrum Masters or other agile practitioners, making it unnecessary to hire external agile coaches.
  4. Resistance to Change: Introducing agile coaches to the organization could lead to resistance from existing Scrum Masters, who may perceive the new role as a threat or challenge to their accountability.
  5. Expertise Misallocation: Agile coaches possess extensive knowledge of agile methodologies and practices; however, their expertise might be unnecessary if the organization already has a firm grasp of agile practices and employs highly proficient Scrum Masters.
  6. Organizational Maturity: If the organization has already reached a high level of agile maturity, introducing agile coaches may have a limited impact on further improvement.
  7. Limited Scope: An agile coach may be unnecessary if the organization is relatively small or has few Scrum teams. The Scrum Masters can effectively manage the agile transformation and continuous improvement efforts within their teams.
  8. Cultural Mismatch: If the organization’s culture does not align with the values and principles of Agile, introducing agile coaches may not be effective in driving meaningful change, as the coaches could face considerable resistance and barriers to implementing agile practices.

How Can We Overcome the Separation of the Roles?

Addressing this anti-pattern requires a strategic, transparent, and educational approach from the Scrum Master. Here are some things you can do to overcome the separation of agile coaches and Scrum Masters:

  • Educate and Advocate: Demonstrate the value of the Scrum Master’s role beyond the Scrum team level. Use the Scrum Guide and Agile Manifesto as reference points to highlight how the Scrum Master is an agent of change that promotes agility throughout the organization.
  • Build Alliances: Collaborate with agile coaches, sharing insights and knowledge. The aim is to blur the distinction and foster mutual respect. Make them allies, not competitors, in the pursuit of organizational agility.
  • Create Visibility: Use Retrospectives, Scrum Reviews, and other events to showcase team achievements and articulate the role of the Scrum Master in those successes beyond their contribution at a tactical level.
  • Engage Leadership: Influence organizational leaders to recognize and value the strategic role of Scrum Masters, comprising coaching leaders or inviting them to participate in Scrum events to see firsthand the benefits of the Scrum framework.
  • Seek Outside Help: If internal efforts are not working, consider bringing in an external consultant or trainer to provide an objective perspective and share insights on best practices from other organizations.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the Scrum Master’s role is not confined to a tactical level. They are change agents, promoting and supporting Scrum by helping everyone understand Scrum theory, practices, rules, and values, within teams and the broader organization. Confusion about this role may indicate a need for more in-depth education about Agile and Scrum across the organization.

How do you handle these two roles? Please share your thoughts with us in the comments.

Related Articles: Agile Coaches next to Scrum Masters?

Download the 73 Scrum Master Interview Questions to Identify Suitable Candidates

A ChatGPT Job Interview for a Scrum Master Position

60 ChatGPT Prompts Plus Prompt Engineering Guide for Scrum Practitioners

How to Sabotage A Scrum Master — 44 Anti-Patterns from the Trenches

Scrum First Principles — How to Elon Musk the Scrum Guide

✋ Do Not Miss Out and Learn more about Agile Coaches — Join the 12,000-plus Strong ‘Hands-on Agile’ Slack Community

I invite you to join the “Hands-on Agile” Slack Community and enjoy the benefits of a fast-growing, vibrant community of agile practitioners from around the world.

Membership Application for the Hands-on Agile Slack Community

If you like to join all you have to do now is provide your credentials via this Google form, and I will sign you up. By the way, it’s free.

The article Why Employing Agile Coaches next to Scrum Masters Is Unnecessary was first published on Age-of-Product.com.


What did you think about this post?

Comments (6)


Alexis
07:07 am June 23, 2023

Very enlightening article !


Eric Wang
06:56 pm July 20, 2023

That's a good point. But it looks like the author does not have Agile Coaching experience. Agile Coach and Scrum Master are both important and they play different roles in organization. Having Agile Coach next to Scrum Master is definitely necessary


Scott Silvester
04:29 am July 21, 2023

I don't think that is correct. If you are in an organisation with one scrum team, you obviously need a Scrum Master; why then should you also hire an agile coach? It is not necessary and seems like overkill to me. A Scrum Master, as per the Scrum guide, serves the Scrum Team, serves the Product Owner, and serves the organisation. A Scrum Master can do anything an agile coach can do, albeit with one caveat...that Scrum is your chosen framework.

I feel what is missing in this article is the difference between an agile coach and a Scrum Master. To me, if you are wanting to do an 'agile transformation', then you will want to hire a consultancy firm with some agile coaches. They will look at the organisation, suggest a few improvements, possibly Lean it up a bit by removing some waste, and possibly choose Scrum as your agile framework.
Once Scrum is chosen, Scrum teams are formed, Scrum Masters, Product Owners, Devs etc are hired, there is no need to have an agile coach, a Scrum Master can do it all as a true leader.

If, however, you decided to mix it up and combine multiple frameworks, then possibly an agile coach may help.


Eric Wang
07:27 pm July 21, 2023

Good explanation.
Agile coach is needed when the organization is not Agile even though there are SMs. After coaching, once all of those roles/accountabilities are on the right track to be Agile, hired Agile coach could step down. But if organization is big, there are plenty of projects that need Agile coaches, Agile CoE is needed to provide Agile coaches to those traditional waterfall projects.

I don't agree with what title says. It's confusing. If the project is using Agile well but they only need a new SM, sure, hiring only SM is enough. But your project just starts from the scratch, you need hire Agile Coach to train the manager, the team, PO and SM. IF it's urgent, hiring a SM is necessary as well. Also Agile coach has different stages to help the team, which are not duties of SM, or not capabilities of SM.


Scott Silvester
11:41 pm July 21, 2023

I recommend reading this article by Barry Overeem which helps clarify the difference. What we need to remember is a Scrum Master is not a junior agile coach.

https://www.scrum.org/resou...


Eric Wang
08:54 am July 22, 2023

Thanks for information. Good article. I like Barry and his Zambie Scrum and liberating structure stuff. But I think someone said in the comment in that article is more accurate. I am also PSPO and PSM from Scrum.org, but I agree with what that comment says." I don't see any organization working strictly under a particular “model” or framework, as scrum, for example.
So, I don't see any sense in the agile coach or scrum master dilemma."

We have background from Scrum.org, including Stefan. But we should all remember Scrum is a Framework and Agile is a mindset.

Here is the whole comment..

"
mmmm…. I think that most important than Scrum, what matters is :

1) understanding and living the agile values and principles, beyond the agile manifesto,
2) embracing lean principles and systemic thinking,
3) applying scientific process and empiricism, and
4) being guided by a higher purpose that ultimately seeks to contribute to a better world.

I love how scrum put in a simple way at least the three first topics, giving and example of how Agile could be experienced in the case of a software development organisation, but I don't see any organization working strictly under a particular “model” or framework, as scrum for example.
So, I don't see any sense in the agile coach or scrum master dilemma.
The answer will depend on the uniqueness of each organization. Despite the many attempts that exist, the origin of an agile coach does not obey any writing, nor standard anywhere. In many cases, someone who identifies as SM could evolve into an Agile Coach stance. Who will determine that? My first element of answer would be: at least make sure you are very clear about the universe that exists within each of the 4 points above"