Skip to main content

Difference between affinity estimation vs relative sizing

Last post 06:27 am April 7, 2020 by Xander Ladage
2 replies
02:04 am April 6, 2020

Hello All,

We knew T-shirt sizing comes under Affinity estimation ,

Also I see there relative sizing is also close to affinity estimation.

Can any one please help me in knowing the difference 


09:00 pm April 6, 2020

Affinity estimation can leverage many types of relative scales, including T shirt sizes (e.g. XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL), story points based on the Fibonacci sequence scale (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21...), or other scales (e.g. dog sizes, gummy bears).

Affinity estimation is a quick way to visualize your Product Backlog into groupings of relative sizes. The Dev Team typically places Product Backlog items in the right relative group. This approach is usually much quicker and easier than trying to estimate your Product Backlog with Planning Poker. The downside is it is less accurate compared to Poker.

Another common approach to relative estimation is to use Planning Poker (based on the Delphi Method). Planning Poker focuses on estimating one Product Backlog item at a time, and is consensus drive. The same relative scales used with Affinity estimation can be used. While Planning Poker takes longer to estimate a large batch of Product Backlog items, it is considered more accurate than Affinity estimation.

Whatever approach you choose to estimate, consider the conversations more valuable than the estimates themselves.

Hope this helps!

Chris

 


06:27 am April 7, 2020

There is no real difference, there are numerous ways to relatively estimate complexity and workload. The one technique might prove to be more accurate and helpfull than others. 

In my teams right now, we use Tshirt sizes (S, M, L, XL) in early stages, and close to planning we use storypoints. This is because close to planning, more details are known due to refinement, and a more accurate value can be assigned.


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.