Skip to main content

Five Scrum Values?

Last post 01:06 pm November 4, 2016 by Steven Mackenzie
4 replies
12:50 pm May 23, 2016

Context: Looking at Lyssa Adkins' high performance tree as described by Luis Gonçalves.

Background: I know we have three pillars, three artifacts, three roles, four (or five, or five and 1/2) events, and multiple rules.

When used within an agile environment, Scrum teams should adhere to the four (actually eight) agile values and twelve principles.

Question: So where did the five "Scrum values" (commitment, courage, openness, focus, respect) come from? These sound like a paraphrase of Lencioni's work. Is there some likelihood of these being incorporated in the Scrum Guide? Were they in a prior version? (I only looked back to 2010)

10:33 am May 25, 2016

These values (of which XP also has a variation) are patterns for achieving quality which seem to have been inspired by “The Timeless Way of Building” by Christopher Alexander, 1979. In "The Scrum Papers", Jeff Sutherland sources this work with regard to the Scrum values.…

05:07 pm May 25, 2016

@Ian, thank you so much for the link. It is really great !

04:48 pm July 14, 2016

The Scrum Guide update for 2016 includes the Scrum values: NOTE: This link will only be relevant until the next update. I've asked for revision history (all versions) to be available but the response indicated that it was not going to happen.

01:06 pm November 4, 2016

They are in the last chapter of "Agile Software Development with Scrum" by Ken Schwaber and Mike Beedle, 2001, according to this blog post from 2008:…

I had long been confused about what the "scrum values" were that my colleagues sometimes spoke about.

By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.