Skip to main content

Agile is constant change

December 4, 2014

One of the key foundations of helping your business become Agile is the use of empiricism. Empiricism is the scientific approach based on evidence, where any idea must be tested against observations, rather than intuition. Empiricism is based on three pillars: transparency, inspection and adaptation. Adaptation has many synonyms, of which ‘change’ is the most common. One of the reasons that I like working within the Scrum framework is that there are clear learning opportunities built in – otherwise you need to put these in yourself.

After a short time you and your team should reflect on what has happened, and how it affected the performance within the team. Building on the better understanding, the team should decide what they will do to enhance the good things, and remove the bad things – that is you should focus on changing the environment to be better. This means that things will be different. If the situation is not different, then you have not acted on the learning (or your team are perfect).

In the movie Groundhog Day, the weatherman (Phil) realises that he is repeating the same day. He then goes wild and breaks all the rules, and after he gets bored and then focuses on improving. He then makes each day a little better than the previous day – until he gets the perfect day.

The resistance to change that he suffers at the start of the movie is similar to how teams struggle to enact change.

Continuous Learning
Constant Continual Learning

Image by John Hain from Pixabay

I have seen a number of teams get stuck because:

1) They try to change too much

2) They don’t see anything to change

3) The team is changing at a rate faster than the organisation can accept
 

Try to change too much

Limit the number of things that you are going to change. If it is a significant or challenging thing, then only take one action. Talk about this item in each Daily Scrum.
 

Nothing to Change

There are two extremes for this mindset, one extreme is being overwhelmed, and the other extreme is that of not seeing any way that the team could work better.

In both situations a way around this is to focus on a clear vision. If the team have a common goal, then the current state can be compared with that goal, and then find the one change that will give the most benefit for the least effort. Once a change, no matter how small, is enacted then you are moving and the momentum can grow.
 

Team vs Organisation change

Often the smaller teams (development and Scrum) gain the insight that agility is a continuous process and a mindset, not a state. Many organisations and leaders think that agile is a silver bullet, that gets invoked and that is all that is required.

The organisation needs to move to the mindset that things will be different, every day, every week. That is at the heart of business agility.

Helping this understanding take hold at a wider level is the responsibility of all the people helping develop the agility of the organisation. Depending on the organisation using a framework may help – the structure provides the robustness needed to embed an enduring change.

You will know your team is actively being agile when you use the phrase “for our team, we have found …” to describe your ways of working- regardless of what framework you started out with. Your team will have developed into a state of continuous improvement, using agile tools and techniques to deliver a better product, more frequently.


What did you think about this post?

Comments (14)


Alberto Silva
04:11 pm July 17, 2019

Simon thanks for your article a good way to improve through empiricism vs. real fact at work.


Vikram Jain
07:25 am August 16, 2019

Thanks Simon Reindl, perfect article about empiricism.
However I would like to have your views on 'When or after say Sprint x can we say my scrum team is perfect ?"


Geoff Hill
01:13 am August 26, 2019

Great question @disqus_V9bHNbyKue:disqus.

Perfect is a very high bar, especially in a constantly changing world. Try to promote a growth mindset, even in a high-performing group.

Tell them they're amazing instead.


Maria Jose Salas
01:35 pm December 6, 2019

Thank you Simon. I would love to work again in a personal growth culture. However my last boss only want me to do whatever she wanted, don't allowing me to innovate or change the status quo. She said "one swallow does not a summer make", refering to my proposals and ideas. How would you manage that type of boss?


Vj Singh
02:17 am January 7, 2020

Hi Maria,
Can you provide some context? Were your ideas were too expensive to execute or impact was big. And if you don't mind sharing any idea you proposed?


Vijaya Kumar Lanka
09:05 am January 20, 2020

If I rephrase your question - does my team become perfect after some number of Sprints ? Perfect in practicing Scrum ? or perfect in what they do ? In a world of empiricism - we try to continuously improve and perfection by definition will negate empiricism . Learning - implementing - learning has no bounds


Shaukat Shah
06:00 pm May 8, 2020

Well done Simon Reindl.
Summary: Adopt a moderate change as doing easy things will not require new learning and will carry no achievement. Huge changes may become too difficult to manage and may extend beyond the resources of the organization. Changes of moderate difficulty are implementable and provide challenging opportunity for learning and improvement. Change shall be a life style rather than a onetime activity.


Femi Aliu
01:20 am June 22, 2020

Absolutely brilliant piece…
Most company learn about Agile and how it is becoming a key to their survival especially with the business environment becoming more complex and volatile… They get stuck implementing these principles as you mentioned in your article by trying to change too many things at the same time.
Agile is a mindset built on four values, built on 12 principles and practiced through many methodologies and framework.. When the mindset and values hasn't been first developed, it's hard to accept being guided by principles or practice whatever methodologies or framework.


Vladimir Nesterovich
01:32 pm October 20, 2020

It's really BIG goal to help stakeholders understand that they need to change to develop the organization


Jérôme Gallecier
02:17 pm December 14, 2021

The reference to the movie Groundhog Day is just brilliant!


Frank Ibazebo
08:04 pm February 28, 2023

Great insight Simon! I agree agility is a continuous state. Changes driven by the organisation, process or the team is vital to create tactical and strategic benefits. Change can be incremental or radical. Attempting too many changes may be counter productive however value could be incremental process improvements. This is the mindset that change can be everyday to make small improvements to the team and the organisation.


Christophe Broult
12:07 pm October 31, 2023

The reference to Groundhog Day illustrates nicely the struggles of going through changes. Those three points you make are giving clarity on the types of difficulties one can encounter when it comes to changing.


Massimiliano Tanzi
10:53 pm March 21, 2024

intersing post and Graph is very useful. BTW i didin't get point that during the first days for
weatherman (Phil)was "the resistence to chage"


segun Fatoki
07:47 am January 17, 2025

Learning | Unlearning | Relearning- That is the way to go.