May 10, 2022

Do your retrospectives suck due to a powerful Product Owner?

Powerful Product Owner

Powerful Product Owner. It sounds like a threat, isn’t it?  Anyone overpowering affects the whole team’s activity and outcome. No wonder this affects retrospectives as well. 

I did a poll on LinkedIn to know what a Scrum team should do to have better outcomes in a retrospective if the Product is a Powerful person.

The maximum number of people voted for “PO not to be a part of Retrospective or half of the retrospective.” 

Let us take the reference of the Scrum Guide for Sprint Retrospective.

Sprint Retrospective

The primo here is that” In the Scrum Guide, it is evident that the whole Scrum team takes part in the Sprint Retrospective. But as known here, individuals’ thoughts or opinions vary when we add a context. 

The context here is “Product Owner being dominant or influential or powerful may make the team feel unsafe. The team may fear being wrong or offending the Product Owner. 

Now, this is the ground for Scrum Master to uphold their accountability,

  • Establishing Scrum as defined in the Scrum Guide
  • Helping for Scrum Team’s effectiveness

Let’s snoop into the actions a Scrum Master can take for the context in our hands. The activities, actions, or moves taken by a Scrum Master determine the significance of the outcome. Here are a few options for the Scrum Master that can be worked on in such conditions.

Building Transparency 

In most organisations, the PO is considered the position of authority. And this way, the problems of developers not interacting much or opening up with the Product Owner begins. Ultimately this lack of Transparency or lack of communication starts affecting the outcome of the Scrum team.   

The three pillars of the empirical method that are the foundation of Scrum are Transparency, Inspection, and Adaptation. Without Transparency in the Sprint Retrospective, the Inspection and adaptation may be flawed. 

Scrum Masters’ can work with the Product Owner to get their buy-in for an intentional collaboration – Like; Product Owners’ committing to be a team person thoroughly to make the team comfortable with their approachable attitude and friendly behaviour. In my experience, Product Owners joining team bonding activities or any opportunity to mingle with the team have minimised the friction and enhanced Transparency. The team bonding activities that worked well for me were the Marsh Mellow challenge, Pot luck lunches etc.

PotluckImage from one of my Potluck experiences with my team in Sydney, Australia

Building Trust

According to human behaviour, the more you feel safe around someone, the better you open up or be transparent with them. And this comes from the level of Trust within the team.

Read more..