Skip to main content

Scrum Guide 2020 Update - What has been removed

November 18, 2020
This is part #6 of 59 in the series Scrum Guide 2020 Updates

A focus on the framework

Scrum is described as a framework, not a methodology. The Scrum Guide provides just enough prescription to allow Scrum to work and encourages its ‘users’ to be smart, adding practices and other things specific to them on top of the framework as needed to form their process. It provides a mechanism called the Retrospective where the Scrum Team can reflect on what worked and what did not to allow the team to work together to change the process as needed to improve how they work. In fact, Scrum encourages inspection and adaption of both the Product and how the Scrum Team works. 

Many Scrum Teams slowly add and remove practices as they seem to help or hinder their work. The Scrum Guide, like a good Scrum Team, has also added content to add clarity or to describe a convention. But unlike a good Scrum Team, it has rarely removed things. With this release of the Scrum Guide, Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland have removed unnecessary content. They have focused on the Scrum Guide as a framework and tried to make it simpler and more focused. That resulted in some things being removed. The following is a list of the majority of removed elements:

  • The prescriptive elements of the Sprint Review.
  • The detailed outcomes defined in the purpose of the Sprint Retrospective. 
  • The improvements that will be implemented in the next Sprint from the Retrospective.
  • Refinement usually consumes no more than 10% of the capacity of the team. 
  • How to monitor progress towards the goal in Product Backlog.
  • The use of an organization’s “Definition of Done”.  
  • The three questions for the Daily Scrum. 
  • Meeting after the Daily Scrum for detailed discussions, replanning, etc. 

Does that mean that these ideas are no longer relevant?

In short, no. Just because they are no longer in the Scrum Guide does not mean that they can not still be usable for your situation. For example, the idea of always having at least one process improvement item from the retrospective in the Sprint Backlog is still a very good idea, however, they are no longer ‘mandatory’ to Scrum. By being less prescriptive the Scrum Guide is more usable and allows ‘users’ to add what works for them, in their context without forcing things that may not make sense for their team or organization. 



 


What did you think about this post?

Comments (6)


Govindraj Tungenwar
06:10 am November 19, 2020

I think its a positive refinement


comcast
06:46 pm November 25, 2020

Thank you for the blog!


Ste Reeves
03:31 pm January 9, 2021

Thank you for categorising those areas removed from the Scrum Guide 2020, very useful.


Nanna
12:30 pm January 12, 2021

So according to this list, a removed element is:
"The use of an organization’s “Definition of Done”"

But in the 2020 guide it is stated:
"If the Definition of Done for an increment is part of the standards of the organization, all Scrum Teams must follow it as a minimum."

Can anyone explain me the difference? I read it as if the organization still can have a say to DoD (as a minimum).


Pramit
08:42 pm March 17, 2021

If the DOD is part of the Organisation then should scrum team follow this as a minimum or is this not mandatory anymore?


KENMEUGNE TCHUINKAM Romuald Fr
06:08 am November 17, 2023

May be by focusing more on the wording : "not to use the organization DoD", but "to follow it as a minimum".
I don't remember the old version wording, but base on your two sentences, I believe the second one provide more clarity to the reader that Scrum Teams should go beyond that organization DoD if it exists. That is a kind of expectation of seekness of quality taking explicitly in consideration what exists. But not use that. Some people use Scrum by the book. Now the 2020 version should make it more clear what is expected for them. Still in a consice document of less than 15 pages.