Skip to main content

The Tyranny of Taylorism & how to detect Agile BS!

June 17, 2020

Something very close to my heart is helping folks understand the origin of the practices that are commonly used in management today. I feel that only with an understanding of history can we figure out how to change the future. I often talk about this in my classes and help folks see why things are the way that they are in many organisations.

We are still using workplace practices developed during the industrial revolution to manage factory workers and the mechanisation of those workers. When we had to build at scale but did not have the technology to build robots, it was down to humans to do this monotonous, repetitive work; Think factory floor or typing pool. These practices, envisioned by Frederic Winston Taylor to control workers, are the Tyranny of Taylorism that we battle every day in our working environments.

While 81% of all development shops say that they are adopting agile, the reality is far from it; only 22% do short iterations, 16% have ordered backlogs, & 13% do retrospectives! 

They still lack feedback loops.

Feedback loops were not significant when our current management practices were developed. We had defigned work, we understood it very well, and we were optimising a production line. 

Those days are gone now!

 

 

View Presentation: https://nkdagility.net/30MVagF

DIB Guide: Detecting Agile BS: https://nkdagility.net/DOD-Detecting​

 

 


What did you think about this post?

Comments (3)


Crayon Inffotech
12:34 pm June 17, 2020

Hello, It was a good experience while reading your blogs. Thanks for sharing with us.
Source: https://tractorguru.in/seco...


Rishi Markenday
03:37 pm June 18, 2020

Hey Martin - thanks for bringing this up. Couldn’t agree more on the importance of understanding where we have been (our history) to determine where we are going (our future)!

Have been researching Taylorism and his scientific principles of management for some time now too. Have not been able to find an inflection point in history, where his principles of breaking down work for “efficiency” has been adopted by the knowledge work industry. Did you come across such an inflection point in your research?


Martin Hinshelwood
11:44 am July 13, 2020

That inflection point was the result of the US military adopting sequential work around the 1950's, making it part of their procurement process and forcing all of their vendors to do the same.

The knowledge work grew inside and in spite of those traditional practices.