Forums

By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. If you have left the first and last name fields blank on your member profile, your email address will be displayed instead.

All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Time-boxing questions
Last Post 01 Dec 2013 06:52 PM by Imansyah Budiman. 4 Replies.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Alexander Walt
New Member
New Member
Posts:1
Alexander Walt

--
24 Nov 2013 05:42 AM
    Hallo everybody,

    i have one interessant question: what happens if the Ddevelopment team cannot complete its work by the end of a timebox?

    1. the timebox is adjusted permanently to reflect reality
    2. the timebox is extended temporaly. Lessons are taken to ensure it doesn't happen again
    3. Scrum should be abandoned
    4. the time-box holds and the development team continuously learns what is actually possible to do within a timebox

    My answer is 4.

    What you meen??

    BR
    Alex
    Ian Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1616
    Ian Mitchell

    --
    24 Nov 2013 08:38 AM
    Yes, 4 is the best answer. The Development Team must hold to the agreed timebox once it has started.
    Imansyah Budiman
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:10
    Imansyah Budiman

    --
    30 Nov 2013 04:39 PM
    Hi Mitchell,

    I agree with you. However, I have a situation here.

    We are running a one-month Sprint and close to the end of the Sprint, we noticed there are issues (bugs) that still major. The system can't go launch without the bugs being fixed.

    Hence, we got 2 options:
    1. Change the time-box to add one more week to fix the bugs where the DT are confident able to fix it.
    2. Still finish the Sprint within the time-box (1 month). And start the next Sprint with just 1-week long to fix the issue..
    3. ?? any suggestion?

    How would you advise in this situation?

    Regards.


    Posted By Ian Mitchell on 24 Nov 2013 01:38 PM
    Yes, 4 is the best answer. The Development Team must hold to the agreed timebox once it has started.

    Ian Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1616
    Ian Mitchell

    --
    01 Dec 2013 04:26 AM
    Assuming you have a fixed delivery date and would only have an extra week after the final sprint, you'd be better off just having that as a 1 week timebox. That's 1 more than you'd have with a 5 week phase. You'll maintain comparible metrics and Scrum events for team inspection & adaption (why did these major issues arise?), and can make suitable plans for the final week including any technical debt that the team will not be able to repay.
    Imansyah Budiman
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:10
    Imansyah Budiman

    --
    01 Dec 2013 06:52 PM
    Thanks Ian for the advice..
    You are not authorized to post a reply.


    Feedback