I agree with you. However, I have a situation here.
We are running a one-month Sprint and close to the end of the Sprint, we noticed there are issues (bugs) that still major. The system can't go launch without the bugs being fixed.
Hence, we got 2 options:
1. Change the time-box to add one more week to fix the bugs where the DT are confident able to fix it.
2. Still finish the Sprint within the time-box (1 month). And start the next Sprint with just 1-week long to fix the issue..
3. ?? any suggestion?
How would you advise in this situation?
Posted By Ian Mitchell on 24 Nov 2013 01:38 PM
Yes, 4 is the best answer. The Development Team must hold to the agreed timebox once it has started.