Forums

By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. If you have left the first and last name fields blank on your member profile, your email address will be displayed instead.

All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Problematic member of a Development Team. Who would remove him or her?
Last Post 08 Jan 2014 01:57 PM by Fredrik Vestin. 5 Replies.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Robert Stone
New Member
New Member
Posts:5
Robert Stone

--
22 Dec 2013 04:29 AM
    Hi everybody,

    One question about Scrum framework.

    If a Development Team had a conflicting member, who would remove him or her?

    A) Scrum Master, because he has to remove impediments

    B) Development Team, because they are self-organized.

    C) Product Owner, because he or she is responsible of the ROI of the project.


    Thank you in advance.
    SREENIVASULU VANAPARTHI
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:1
    SREENIVASULU VANAPARTHI

    --
    22 Dec 2013 05:00 PM
    Scrum Master
    Bengt Brodersen
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:2
    Bengt Brodersen

    --
    27 Dec 2013 08:09 AM
    definitely B
    The Team should have the rights to do so.
    The scrum master is not allowed to hire or fire people.
    Fabio Silva
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:14
    Fabio Silva

    --
    06 Jan 2014 12:03 PM

    Posted By Bengt on 27 Dec 2013 09:09 AM
    definitely B
    The Team should have the rights to do so.
    The scrum master is not allowed to hire or fire people.


    According to my understanding of the Guide, first the Scrum Master together with the Dev Team should talk somehow and try to manage the situation. Nonetheless, the dev team must be capable to self organize and therefore, ask for the member's removal of the team.

    Someone with a lot of practical experience can confirm or correct us with much more competence =)
    Ian Mitchell
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1451
    Ian Mitchell

    --
    06 Jan 2014 12:43 PM
    > first the Scrum Master together with the Dev
    > Team should talk somehow and try to
    > manage the situation. Nonetheless, the dev
    > team must be capable to self organize and
    > therefore, ask for the member's removal

    I think that's right. From the Scrum Master's perspective the impediment is the conflict, not the person. That's the impediment the SM would try to remove. The Development Team, meanwhile, are self-organizing and that implies an ability to inspect and adapt their own composition.
    Fredrik Vestin
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:68
    Fredrik Vestin

    --
    08 Jan 2014 01:57 PM
    I think this question is very theoretical in nature. We can rule out the PO, which leaves the team or the SM.

    Obviously the team can ask for a team member to be removed, but the questions is "who would remove him/her from the team". Asking for it and doing it is not necessarily the same thing.

    If the team has mandate to adapt their composition to remove members that also implies that they can also include new members as they see fit. While they're at it why not decide to work only 6hrs/day and have 10 weeks vacation, and free lunches. Again, a very theoretical question.
    You are not authorized to post a reply.


    Feedback