Skip to main content

Balancing Scrum Practices in SAP HR Projects Under Compliance Constraints

Last post 07:16 pm November 3, 2025 by Ian Mitchell
1 reply
10:52 am November 3, 2025

I’ve been working on an SAP SuccessFactors project while studying for the C_HCMP_2311 certification exam, and one challenge I keep running into is maintaining Scrum’s rhythm in a compliance-heavy environment.

Some deliverables, especially those involving HR policies or regional labor laws, require external reviews that don’t align neatly with sprint timelines. This sometimes makes it difficult to keep a consistent Definition of Done or maintain predictable velocity.

Through my work and preparation materials from Pass4Future, I’ve been reflecting on how Scrum can adapt in such structured project landscapes. I’d like to hear from others who’ve faced similar challenges, how do you handle sprint planning when compliance reviews or sign-offs fall outside the sprint cycle?

Do you integrate those tasks into the backlog, or manage them as separate governance activities?
Thanks in advance


07:16 pm November 3, 2025

If an external review is necessary for work to be Done, the truth being exposed is that the external reviewers are in fact Developers. Whether they realize this or not is another matter...their labor or industry is nevertheless needed to have an increment of immediately usable quality.

If they don't share in this commitment, then there is a deficit for release and technical debt  (which could be process debt) is being accumulated. The best thing to do is to establish transparency over the situation by accounting for undone (e.g. "unreviewed") work on the Product Backlog. The Product Backlog must tell the truth at all times about how much work remains for the Product, including any technical debt.


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.