Skip to main content

What Are some commonly observed Scrum Myths, Mysteries, and Misconceptions?

November 28, 2016

I am listing out some commonly observed Scrum Myths, Mysteries, and Misconceptions from my experience.


  • Scrum Teams are assigned to several projects or features. This results in context switching (i.e., multitasking), and the outcome is increased cycle time and delayed value delivery to business.

  • The software is not released to market frequently, thereby missing the opportunity to gather customer feedback.

  • When Scrum Teams say “Done,” they are not really “Done.” They need additional regression test cycles, or they need additional cycles to integrate their work with the work of other teams.

  • There is more than one Product Owner for one product with no clear accountability.

  • Proxy Product Owners are assigned to the Scrum Team with no empowerment to make business decisions, resulting in unnecessary delays.

  • The role of the Scrum Master is undermined by assigning a part-time Scrum Master or team members taking turns to play the role of a Scrum Master in every Sprint.

  • There is a certain myth that burn-down charts, burn-up charts, and cumulative-flow diagrams must be used by the Scrum Teams as metrics. The Scrum framework does not prescribe any of these metrics. Depending on the value these metrics drive, you can choose to use them or drop them altogether.

  • It is a myth that success of the team can be measured by an increase in the team’s velocity. Velocity is neither good nor bad. It is just a metric that can be handy for planning. It is a metric to measure capacity, not productivity.

  • There are Sprints called Sprint 0, Design Sprint, Architectural Sprint, Hardening Sprint, Stabilization Sprint, and Testing Sprint. The only true Sprint is a time-box of one month or less during which a “Done,” usable, and potentially releasable Product Increment is created.

  • There are Sprints after Sprints just to build the overall architecture with no real business functionality at the end of each Sprint.

  • Instead of recruiting someone with experience in working with Scrum, organizations recruit someone with no prior Scrum experience or send their in-house project managers to a two-day Scrum class, hoping they can play the role of an effective Scrum Master.

  • ....

  •  


The above excerpt is from book "Scrum Insights For Practitioners: The Scrum Guide Companion"

What is your list of commonly observed Scrum Myths, Mysteries, and Misconceptions?


What did you think about this post?

Comments (6)


Andrew M Hayward
03:29 pm November 28, 2016

For me the biggest misconception is that scrum is something developers do. Management continues to work as they did previously. Productivity is measured by features delivered and not value and projects go through multiple analysis and design iterations where the MVP is agreed on with no feedback loops and then the team struggles to deliver large projects incrementally.


Hiren Doshi
05:47 pm November 28, 2016

Yes, the fragile adoption of Agile.


Alan Larimer
11:14 pm December 5, 2016

As general as I can make the most common misunderstanding . . .
Scrum is nothing more than a re-branding of titles, executing software development in the same (documented, staged, hand-off) manner, but with the addition of two week deadlines and daily status reports slash task assignments for slash by management.

Some others come quickly to mind . . .
Sprint Retrospectives are for Team Building. (Ignoring the inspect and adapt purpose.)
Sprint Reviews are an internal demonstration of the product. (Ignoring the customer and feedback loop.)
Each Increment is a basic, functioning Minimum Viable Product only. (Ignoring testing and technical debt.)
The Sprint Backlog is a commitment by the Development Team to which the Product Owner and Scrum Master hold them accountable. (Ignoring forecast and unknown.)


Darshit Dave
08:43 am December 19, 2016

True, the above are the myths or misunderstandings for the people who haven't welcomed the Agile with open heart and mind - I had been working with Scrum since 2008 and believe me, it has given best results, from small team size to the team size of 250+ members. If processes are set up nicely, people are given proper training and teams have got the scrum masters who really knows how to encourage and train the team to change their mindset, it will prove one of the best development model.


Techfritters
03:37 pm September 26, 2017

1. Daily Scrum is a status meeting where managers ask for status updates to make sure the team is on track.
2. Daily scrum is a stand-up meeting.
3. Being cross-functional means there are no experts in the team. Every team member knows something about everything.
4. Scrum teams do not document requirements. Why write requirements if the requirements will change anyway? Being agile means lets write code now (and think later :-)).
5. There is absolutely no scope for scrum in fixed price projects.


Claudia Kommerell
10:22 am May 28, 2024

My 5 cents/myths:
- you can speed up scrum by doing review and retrospective in one single event and limiting the attendees to the scrum team itself and limiting the total timebox for this retro/review to 1,5 hours for a 2-week sprint.
- you don't have to discuss product value or customer expectations, it's totally sufficient to just slice the software you are developing into comprehensible product slices.
- you have to have epics and stories and task and they have to have the text " x is doing y, so that z profits in that way..." otherwise you are not doing scrum
- we don't have to care about tech debt, we don't have time for that, we focus on the customer and his needs.
- cross-functional teams and pair programming means: one expert shows a to a total newcomer, how it's done. Then the newcomer is capable of working on his/her own.