Skip to main content

Commitment is not free overtime

June 26, 2020

Commitment is not free overtimeCommitment is key. Commitment is somethins every team, every manager, every organization wants and needs. Commitment promises better results, engaged people, good relationship with work and many other benefits.

The problem is that it can be misunderstood. 

 

Some time ago a certain Quora question has been published:

Source: Quora.com

You can find the original thread here: [link]

 

A certain CEO asks how to increase commitment, because people only work in their work hours, not staying overtime. 

Comments solved the problem quickly, calling out slavery and other forms of opression by expecting self-inflicted overtime.

 

Sorry to break it to you, dear CEO, but this is not commitment. Commitment is not free overtime. 

 

So what is Commitment?

Let's look at a definition from APA:

"Obligation or devotion to a person, relationship, task, cause, or other entity or action" [source]

and from a wide - sourced wiki: 

"Commitment is the mental or physical act of more directing increased resources to an activity or interpersonal relationship. Processes of cognitive dissonance may then increase the perceive value of the target and this may lead to increased involvement and motivation." [source]

 

As you can see, Commitment towards a person requires a relationship - and a relationship is two-sided. You cannot expect commitment and give nothing back. In fact commitment in a team creates teamwork and safe environment, where you can trust that someone did everything hty possibly could to help others, but you will also do the same.  Sometimes this will mean staying longer, sometime this will mean leaving early to rest and come back at 100% of your capacity. 

Commitment is not universal - it will mean something different for each person. For example to me as a business owner it means I can skip my wage if the funds run low. To my marketing magician it mean she can work late at night to start a campaign at the right moment. And all those meanings come from individuals committing to others, goals or organizations. 

It's a good idea to ask your team what does that mean to them. Once you know it, you can start building a culture that will not only suit all your team members, but also bring you closer to achieving common goals. 

 

Rich Visotcky, PST wirites:

 

To open with another potentially shifting statement for some: Commitment isn’t something taken from one person to another, it’s something given by one person to another or even to themselves.  If someone demands commitment from you, what they’re really doing is creating an environment of us vs. them, one of fear, and one of uncertainty, no matter how well worded.  Instead, if a person commits themselves to something, they feel a sense of ownership and are more likely to follow through with that commitment.

 

Let’s bring this back to “free overtime.”  If I’m coming from the point of someone looking for overtime from my team because they’re “committed” to the work, my company, their salary, etc. then all I’m likely to get are disengaged employees who hope they keep getting paid while secretly wishing for a new job.  Contrast that with my personal commitment to the work we’re doing and the goals we’re trying to achieve.  In this scenario, I’m in it for more than the money.  I want to see our goals realized, people served, and even my personal craft in the work, and that purpose will propel me forward.  If overtime is ever “free” it’s because people gift it to you, just like they would gift their time to an organization or movement they identify with.

 

What's your opinion? Let me know in the comments below!

 

You can also join me and other PSTs - Rich Visotcky, François Fort and others on a tag-me discussion on Linkedin [link]. You also can be tagged to provide your opinion on the next #daretochange  - just let me know!


What did you think about this post?

Comments (9)


Kate Hobler (Terlecka)
07:18 pm June 28, 2020

Technically I can be considered a millennial - I was born on January 5th 1985, so I make it to some definitions of a Millennial by 5 days. So if you prefer to think like this, it's OK with me.
I started my carrier in the worst moment of the 2008 crisis and worked my way to owning my business in a place where women are not trusted or even welcome (the world of 50+ management and owners). I took determination and luck to become and keep myself as a business owner through two world economic crisises, a market breakdown and many other problems.
Though that time I have worked with over 100 companies from 4 continents and I can assure you that in every business you can find people with little or no understanding on how people relationship work. These businesses usually don't last long or have to be very lucky to find people to employ - and they are not really committed individuals. One can operate like that, but it's very suboptimal and you can get more by treating your people right - and that's true for every type of business.
I am really sorry that you have been so unlucky, that you never met any decent companies. Unfortunately the law of probability is clear - it is possible to never see the other side of the coin. But there is also something called the Confirmation Bias - if you believe those don't exist, you won't notice even if you actually worked in one of those "decent" companies.
Recently a friend of mine quit a job at a company, where he could not stand the culture. Since he was a key employee, his bosses had several talks with him and didn't believe that a culture can be something other than carrot and stick. He brought 6 business owners from the same industry, so that they could talk to them and understand what impact culture has. They never believed that other (than a directive) culture exists and told him that he's looking for unicorns. A week later he got a job in one of those "unicorns".
I wish you can find a spot in one of those decent places, that are just now waking up from the Corona slumber and starting to look for decent people to fit their culture.


Kate Hobler (Terlecka)
07:29 pm June 28, 2020

Money is one thing, but also being treated as a partner and a human being makes a difference. Many startups pay very little, but people still love working for them and they commit - because they act like a family or a pack of friends and care for their relationships 😊


Geert Bossuyt
06:28 am June 29, 2020

I like your take on commitment.

I always like to say that commitment is 'the ability to make choices that lead to your goal'.
It's an ability, you can practice it and become good at it.
... the ability to make choices. Not doing overtime. Not bossing around. Just the art of seeing the options and choosing the one that helps you out.
... choices that lead to your goal. Not just any goal. It needs to be yours. Otherwise you won't know what the right choices are.

Commitment is about achieving goals. Not about effort.
And I also like that it has the word 'lead' in it. Probably the short version would be to say that commitment is when you lead your way to your goals.

Combined with your view on the need for relation, I think it makes perfect sense.
If we're in such a relation that my goal and your goal support each other, we can both commit to our goal and make a real difference together. Because we would be motivated to find and make choices that help the both of us.
The other way around, when our goals are incompatible, we can do whatever we will, but there will never be any commitment together.


Kate Hobler (Terlecka)
09:37 am June 29, 2020

I like your train of thought - it's very practical and nicely describes how goal-oriented leadership can pull commitment. Thank you! :)


Todd Flanders
03:26 pm June 29, 2020

Great article. I've worked for multiple executive teams who get very nervous when they don't see people working overtime. By coincidence, they also did not trust teams to make their own commitments. Commitments were based on promises made to customers with no input from the people doing the work. These executive teams did not do well in the long term. The high performing teams I've worked on do not operate that way. Product ownership communicates the most important work to be done, and the development team communicates when these features will be available in production. If the production schedule changes, that's communication from the development team to the product owner, not the other way around.


Todd Flanders
03:39 pm June 29, 2020

I'm wondering if you are defending overtime, or defending the appearance of overtime. These are very different things. I'm guessing the author would expect that a professional spends time refining their craft and improving outside of the 9-5. I'm guessing that she would also expect that an enthusiastic employee would focus on the outcome of a project rather than hours spent. As far as "making it in the real world", I agree that the appearance of productivity can be more profitable in some organizations than actual productivity. These organizations should expect that productive competitors will be eating their lunch. You get what you reward. If reward is for hours spent in the office, that's what you are going to get. Hours, not value.


Kate Hobler (Terlecka)
03:43 pm June 29, 2020

Thank you! I appreciate that a lot and I also see the same problem with some executive teams. I like the way you summed it up. Trust is a prerequisite to commitment and commitment is a prerequisite to high performance.


David Sabine
02:53 pm July 3, 2020

Hi @Paladin1, I find this comment strange: "its rather improper the the person who wrote the articles to get involved in the comment section"

Rather: I would fully expect the author of an article to participate in the comment section, to participate in the ongoing dialogue.

Having said that, I would encourage you (and everyone in these comments) to practice Scrum's value of Respect. Your quip about "spoiled millennial" was unnecessarily combative. (I suspect you knew that when you wrote it.)

Thank you for following-up with further explanation about your circumstance: " I work in management for a Fortune 200 company. I love my job. They've invested a lot into me and treat me well. Last week another manager was out on vacation so I worked 90 hours over three shifts…" and so on.

Your further explanation, I believe, supports Kate's own views — specifically that Commitment is a 'relationship' and isn't a one-way street. You love your job; your company has invested in you, they treat you well. In response, you're willing to go above and beyond when it's needed. But about the CEO in the Quora question: we simply cannot know (given the limited information available in the question itself) the dynamics of their relationship — we cannot know their compensation structure — we cannot know the culture of their workplace.

I'm 45. (Not a millennial.) And I, like you, have worked in environments that demand long hours, full attention, personal sacrifice. And I've been happy to do so when I've felt the company's Commitment to me is reciprocal. I think Kate's post is simply pointing out the need for reciprocity. I think she has purposely chosen a conversation-starting/potentially-controversial stance to encourage vigorous dialogue. So, I appreciate your vigorous dialogue! But to keep this dialogue focused on the topic, we can all avoid personal insults.


David Sabine
05:00 pm July 3, 2020

Hmm.

Following my comments, in which I tried to build a bridge through an already combative thread, you've decided to respond to my comment so condescendingly. You appear ready to double-down. I find that unfortunate — there are so many ways this discussion could become positive and interesting.

I believe you're more interested in being divisive and rude, than being understanding and respectful. Therefore, I will disengage now.

Good day.