Is Singapore Too Risk Averse for True Agile Success?

(Singapore)

December 29, 2025

Is Singapore Too Risk Averse for True Agile Success?

When you spend time with teams in Singapore, you start to notice something interesting.

On paper, Singapore looks like an innovation superstar. In practice, many teams still play it safe. They follow the ceremonies and say the right words, but hesitate when it comes to real experiments and real risk.

This pattern shows up across Agile adoption in Singapore, where high adoption rates do not always translate to deep cultural change.

So the question is real and slightly uncomfortable.

Is Singapore too risk averse for true agility

Let us unpack this slowly and factually.

Singapore is officially very innovative

First, some context. Singapore consistently ranks among the most innovative economies in the world.

The Global Innovation Index places Singapore fourth globally in 2024 and first in Asia [1].
In the 2025 update Singapore remains in the global top ten and ranks fifth among 139 economies [2].

The World Bank has also described Singapore as an innovation driven city built through deliberate long term policy design that includes education and culture as key pillars [3].

This already gives us an important insight.

The story is not that Singapore is not innovative.
The story is that Singapore performs extremely well at a national and systemic level, yet still struggles with day to day risk taking inside teams.

What researchers say about risk and failure in Singapore

There is a clear pattern in research.

A study on creativity in the Singapore economy found that aversion to failure is a barrier to innovation. In a merit based society where promotion depends heavily on performance, people may avoid unnecessary risks even if they perform very well [4].

Earlier research on entrepreneurship in Singapore argued that the environment has historically limited entrepreneurial behaviour and that the government itself recognised a lack of risk taking in the general population. This recognition triggered policies aimed at developing a stronger risk taking and entrepreneurial mindset [5].

Public commentary reflects this too.
A former Member of Parliament speaking through the Action Community for Entrepreneurship described Singaporeans as often reluctant to take responsibility if an innovation fails [6].

Surveys show the same pattern.
A study of more than six hundred managers published in Today Online found that while many organisations encourage innovation, many others still struggle with openness to risk and bold ideas [7].

So the theme is consistent.
Singapore wants innovation and invests in it but fear of failure and risk aversion remain real cultural constraints.

But wait, Hofstede says Singapore has low uncertainty avoidance

According to Hofstede, Singapore has extremely low uncertainty avoidance. One of the lowest in the world with a score of around eight [8].
Low uncertainty avoidance usually means people are comfortable with ambiguity and change.

At the same time Singapore scores high on power distance with a score near seventy four [9]. High power distance means people accept hierarchical structures and may be cautious about challenging authority or taking risks in front of senior people.

Put these two together and you get a unique mix.

People may be comfortable with change but still hesitate when the risk could make them look bad in front of a boss or client.

This tension shows up a lot in team behaviour.

What true agility actually requires

Real agility depends on simple behaviours.

The courage to try things that might not work yet
The honesty to admit when something is not working
The habit of learning quickly from small experiments instead of hiding big failures

Agile frameworks reduce risk through short Sprints and fast feedback loops. But this only works if teams feel emotionally safe enough to run experiments and leaders treat small failures as learning rather than embarrassment.

This is why building leadership capabilities that create psychological safety matters. Professional Agile Leadership development can help leaders understand how to foster experimentation cultures and make a significant difference in how teams approach risk.

How this tension shows up in Singapore teams

These are practical observations from coaching and training teams in and around Singapore.

A strong desire to get things right the first time
Care for reputation with stakeholders
Visible respect for authority and hierarchy

These create predictable patterns.

Teams do more analysis than needed before a small test
People wait for a senior person to speak first
Product owners hesitate to release thinner versions, often wanting to perfect features before release
Scrum Masters manage upwards to make experiments feel safe

These match the research.

So is Singapore too risk averse for true agility

A more accurate reading:

Singapore has built one of the strongest innovation platforms in the world
yet its education and merit based structures still push individuals to avoid failure, which limits everyday experimentation

The system is pro innovation
The individual cannot afford a visible mistake

This is the real blocker.

What leaders and teams in Singapore can do about it

Create explicit cover for experiments
Reward learning not only success
Keep experiments small
Use data to make risk feel safe
Model humility at the top

For leaders looking to build these capabilities, Professional Agile Leadership training focuses on creating environments where experimentation feels safe. Similarly, Professional Scrum Master training helps Scrum Masters develop the skills to facilitate experiments and protect teams from unnecessary pressure. Product Owners can also benefit from Professional Scrum Product Owner training to learn how to balance stakeholder expectations with the need for iterative experimentation.

A different way to end the question

Singapore has proven it can design world leading innovation systems [1] [2].

The next step is human.

Can leaders make space for safe experimentation
Can teams treat failure as information
Can organisations use discipline to make experiments small and safe rather than perfect and slow

If the answer becomes yes, true agility in Singapore may become its next competitive advantage.

Is Singapore Too Risk Averse for True Agile Success?

Is Singapore Too Risk Averse for True Agile Success?

Singapore is officially very innovative

What researchers say about risk and failure in Singapore

But wait, Hofstede says Singapore has low uncertainty avoidance

What true agility actually requires

How this tension shows up in Singapore teams

So is Singapore too risk averse for true agility

What leaders and teams in Singapore can do about it

A different way to end the question

What did you think about this post?

Share with your network

Comments (0)