The red light flashes. The build is broken. Deployment is halted on a Friday afternoon. In many organizations, a manager storms into the team room (or Slack channel) with a single, destructive question:
"Who pushed that commit?"
In Professional Scrum, this question is an anti-pattern that destroys Empiricism.
Why? Because Scrum relies on Transparency. If a Developer knows they will be shamed or penalized for breaking the build, they will hide their mistakes. They will pad their estimates to avoid "being wrong." They will stop taking the creative risks necessary for innovation.
When fear enters the Scrum Team, Inspection and Adaptation die. You don't get "zero bugs", you just get "zero reported bugs."
Here is how to replace a Culture of Blame with a Culture of Safety, ensuring your Retrospectives actually drive improvement.
The Silence of the Bugs
Harvard researcher Amy Edmondson defines Psychological Safety as the shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking.
In a Scrum context, safety is the foundation of the Scrum Values:
- Courage: To admit "I made a mistake."
- Openness: To show the Stakeholders the real state of the Increment, even when it’s ugly.
Without safety, errors fester in the code until they explode in production. As we explore in our guide on The Great Detox, a team that hides small failures will eventually face a catastrophic one.
The Blameless Post-Mortem: A Tool for Scrum Teams
When a Sprint collapses or a production incident occurs, high-performing teams don't look for a scapegoat. They look for the system failure.
We recommend replacing the "Witch Hunt" with a Blameless Retrospective. This isn't about avoiding accountability; it's about shifting accountability from the person to the process.
Here is a 3-step framework for your next Retrospective or Incident Review:
1. The Prime Directive
Start every session by reading Norm Kerth’s Prime Directive, a cornerstone of Agile Retrospectives:
"Regardless of what we discover, we understand and truly believe that everyone did the best job they could, given what they knew at the time, their skills and abilities, the resources available, and the situation at hand."
2. Build the Timeline (The "What")
Do not ask "Why" yet. Construct a factual timeline. "At 10:00 AM, code was deployed. At 10:05 AM, latency spiked." Facts remove emotion and defensiveness from the room.
3. The Systemic "5 Whys"
When you find the error, ask why the System allowed it to happen.
- Wrong: "John forgot to run the test."
- Right: "Why did the CI/CD pipeline allow the build to pass without running that test?"
From "Who" to "How": The Leader's Language Shift
If you are a Scrum Master or Agile Leader, your language programs the culture. To build trust, you must audit your questions during a crisis:
- Instead of: "Who caused this outage?"
- Ask:"What part of our process failed?"
- Instead of: "Don't let this happen again."
- Ask:"How can we automate a safety net for this?"
When you attack the process, you protect the people. And when people feel protected, they focus on solving problems, not covering their tracks.
Safety is the Pre-Requisite for Speed
You cannot have a team that moves fast if they are terrified of breaking things. By adopting Blameless Retrospectives, you turn every failure into a learning asset—a true expression of Agile adaptation.
This article is adapted from "Who Broke the Build?" Why Blame Culture is the Enemy of Innovation. You can read the full guide here: Psychological Safety Guide.
Join the Community at Agile Leadership Day India 2026 How do we maintain Psychological Safety when AI Agents start joining our teams?