Skip to main content

Your Stakeholders Don't Trust Your Process. Here's How to Fix That.

December 15, 2025

The Meta-Retrospective: Turn Skeptical Stakeholders Into Process Allies

Most Scrum Teams run Retrospectives behind closed doors, then wonder why stakeholders treat their process like a black box. The complaint is always the same: “They don’t understand how we work.” But what have you done to help them understand?

The Meta-Retrospective fixes this. You invite stakeholders into the room, not to observe but to participate.

The Meta-Retrospective — How to Get Stakeholders Onboard

Read more on how to organize such a Meta-Retrospective, and do not forget to check out the free Miro Meta-Retrospective template.

What It Is

Businesspeople, customers, and anyone with skin in the game sit alongside the team and work through what’s working well, what’s broken, and what needs to change. No agile jargon required. No prior Scrum knowledge needed. The format handles 15 or more people and takes under two hours. Run it quarterly or after major milestones.

You leave with action items the team can fix now, plus issues that need leadership support and finally have stakeholder backing for escalation.

How to Run It

The session has two parts:

Part 1: Scrum Values Warm-Up

Pairs identify traits that support effective collaboration, then map their answers to the five Scrum values. This part isn’t about team-building theater. It signals that elephants in the room are welcome. Courage, openness, and respect aren’t posters on the wall. They’re the ground rules.

Part 2: The Two-Axis Exercise

Draw a horizontal axis representing learnings. Participants pair up and identify their three most important insights from the period under review. Each pair posts their stickies and clusters similar items.

Next, add a vertical axis for influence. Ask participants to reposition all stickies according to how much control the team actually has over each item. Let things settle until people stop moving stickies.

Now reveal the four quadrants. “Get to Work” holds high-influence items requiring immediate action. “Talk to Management” captures critical issues beyond the team’s control. “Keep Doing” marks what’s working. “Luck” identifies things that went well by accident and deserve no further investment.

Focus on “Get to Work” first. Dot-vote to prioritize, then run a Lean Coffee discussion on the top items to generate specific actions. If time permits, work through “Talk to Management” the same way.

There is a free Miro template for the Meta-Retrospective if you want to skip the setup.

The Meta-Retrospective

What Happens When You Do This

Stakeholders stop guessing what happens inside your Sprints. They see how their requests ripple through the team’s work. They understand why some things take longer than expected. And when the team needs organizational support, stakeholders fight for it instead of blocking it.

You cannot complain about stakeholders who don’t understand your process while keeping them out of the room all the time where that understanding gets built.

Conclusion

Running a Meta-Retrospective is an excellent exercise for fostering collaboration within the extended team, building a shared understanding of the big picture, and generating valuable action items. Best of all, it takes less than two hours to make the ideas of avoiding ‘Muda’ and practicing ‘Kaizen’ tangible to everyone.

Your stakeholders are not the enemy. They’re allies you haven’t asked yet.

🗞 Shall I notify you about articles like this one? Awesome! You can sign up here for the ‘Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter and join 42,000-plus subscribers.


What did you think about this post?

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!