Skip to main content

How to Handle Unplanned Work in Scrum

November 18, 2022

It’s a myth that Scrum Teams don’t plan.  Scrum Teams plan at the Sprint Planning event and when refining work items.  They also create a forecast or a roadmap that shows their plans across multiple Sprints.  

Scrum teams plan frequently

Scrum Teams plan frequently to navigate complicated environments where new information emerges constantly. The team inspects new knowledge and adapts their approach to take advantage of what they've learned.

What happens when the team is confronted with unplanned work mid-Sprint? That’s what we’re going to delve into here.

When unplanned work is identified in Scrum

Unplanned work happens

No matter how much a Scrum Team plans, there are times when someone asks them to undertake unplanned work mid-Sprint.  When that happens, the Developers and the Product Owner should meet to discuss how to respond.  

When unplanned work is identified in Scrum

 

Why the Developers and the Product Owner?  The Product Owner is accountable for ordering the work items in the Product Backlog.  They alone can decide whether this work warrants them adding it to the Product Backlog and whether it is important enough to consider adding it to the Sprint Backlog for the current Sprint.   

On the other hand, the Developers own the Sprint Backlog, and they alone can determine whether they can undertake this work without putting the Sprint Goal at risk. 

If the Product Owner does ask to add work items to the Sprint, the Developers may refuse, or they might negotiate with the Product Owner to determine which work to remove from the Sprint to accommodate the new request.  We should never make changes to the Product Backlog that will put the Sprint Goal at risk.

Some Scrum Teams face a lot of unplanned work.  For example, many Scrum Teams handle production support issues in addition to new development.  For many organizations, production support is unpredictable and cannot be delayed until the next Sprint — they must handle requests immediately.  Although this kind of work is unplanned, it is critical to the product's success.  

Following are a few options for how to handle unplanned work.  (If you have other ideas, add them in the comments section below!)

 

Option 1:  Leave some capacity free, and add unplanned work to the Sprint Backlog as it comes in

In this option, Developers estimate during Sprint Planning how much unplanned work they expect to receive in the upcoming Sprint and leave some capacity free to deal with it.  It’s a tricky proposition because how can we plan for the unplanned?  We can’t, but we can make educated guesses by looking at past performance.  What percentage of the Scrum Team’s time during previous Sprints was eaten up by unplanned work?  Is the unexpected work highly variable, or is it fairly steady?  The answers to these questions can help us to estimate how much capacity to leave free for last-minute requests that might come in during the Sprint.

As the unplanned work comes in, if the Product Owner and Developers agree to add it to the Sprint, they should include it in the Sprint Backlog for transparency and to ensure that the team can track the progress of all work in the Sprint.  

 

Option 2:  Leave some capacity free, but don’t add unplanned work to the Sprint Backlog

If the unplanned work consists of a set of smaller tasks, the Scrum Team might consider whether it is worthwhile to add this work to the Sprint Backlog despite the lack of transparency.  In large volumes, adding these smaller tasks to the Sprint Backlog can create an administrative burden.  In that case, the team can still take the approach of not fully loading the Sprint as in option two, but they may handle the unplanned work outside the Sprint's scope. In this case, the team leaves a part of their capacity undedicated to free the team from the administrative burden of adding it to the Sprint Backlog.  

Option 3:  A separate team handles unplanned work

https://www.rebelscrum.site/

If unplanned work is significant and frequent, the Scrum team might decide to split up, dedicating a single team to production support.  Scrum teams are self-managing, which means that they control the way that they approach their work, including how to structure the team itself.     

 

Strategies for limiting the impact of unplanned work

As we discuss in the Professional Scrum Master course, every Sprint is an agreement between the organization and the Scrum team.  The Scrum Team needs to be as free as possible to focus on the work of the Sprint and regular refinement activities. In exchange, the organization will receive an increment of usable product frequently.  However, it can be difficult in some organizations to completely eliminate unplanned work.  If your team faces unexpected work routinely, below are a few strategies we can use to cope.

Finish the current work item first

When unplanned work strikes, it can be tempting to stop what we’re doing and pivot immediately to the emergency.  Don’t do it!  Instead, finish the current work and then begin the next highest-ordered work item.  Why?  Because when we put work on pause and start working on a different thing before we have finished the first thing, we have a lot of half-baked work sitting around, creating waste.  That “bread” can’t sit on the counter forever before going stale. It will also take longer to complete that original work item because we will have to regroup when we eventually return to it.

Limit your work in progress and finish what you started first

 

Limit work in progress

Too much work in progress

If the team is facing a lot of unplanned work, it is even more pressing for us to limit our work in progress.  Work in progress refers to the number of items we are working on during the Sprint.  If we have a lot of work in progress and get hit with unplanned work, we have a lot of juggling to do before we can pivot to that additional work.  By limiting work in progress, we don’t have a lot of work to put down or complete before we can shift gears to focus on the unplanned work.  

 

Cut the work smaller

Cut work smaller for more efficient Scrum teams

Another strategy for teams facing a lot of unplanned work is to cut our planned work into smaller pieces.  Cutting the work smaller will enable us to finish our current task and pivot more quickly if unplanned work comes knocking at our door.

Pairing up

Pair programming can help teams be more flexible

 

Rather than each Developer taking on separate work, pairing involves two Developers working on the same item. This strategy delivers two benefits. One, in effect, pairing limits work in progress. Second, it gives the team greater flexibility when faced with unplanned work because they can finish current work items faster or get one of the Developers in the pair to pivot while the other remains on the original task. 

 

Conclusion

No matter how much a Scrum Team plans, there are times when someone requests unplanned work mid-Sprint.  When that happens, the Developers and the Product Owner should meet to determine whether to add the requested work to the current Sprint.  Scrum Teams should decide up front how they will handle unplanned work — will it be added to the Sprint Backlog or completed outside of the scope of the Sprint?  If there is frequent unexpected work, should the team leave some capacity free to handle it, or should a separate team undertake the work?  These are questions only the Scrum Team can answer, and the approach may evolve as we learn more about the customer's needs.

Sign up for Rebel Scrum’s  Applying Professional Scrum class to learn more about the Scrum framework.  If you are a Scrum Master looking to take your team to the next level, signup for Rebel Scrum’s upcoming Professional Scrum Master course.

To learn more about how to apply Scrum in your unique situation, join us for a day of learning and discussion at next year’s Scrum Day, scheduled for September 14, 2023, in Madison, Wisconsin, brought to you by Rebel Scrum.

 

Scrum Day Madison 2023



 


What did you think about this post?

Comments (6)


Ani Sathe
11:44 am November 22, 2022

Dedicating a team to unplanned work in a sprint is always tricky because of the following reasons 1. the dedicated team may not have the knowledge or expertise to take up the unplanned work 2. it can be demotivating to some teams because if this is production support then it is like washing up other people's dishes ie going through someone else's code and trying to debug.


xOfi
05:45 am November 23, 2022

In my understanding the dedicated team can vary and can be settled as the unplanned work appears. Those who can and would like to work on the unplanned tasks finish their actual task and shift to the unplanned work. In cases when no one would like to take it, they can preset an order and rotate this role so whoever is the next in the line will take the unplanned work.


Alan Deffenderfer
01:46 pm November 23, 2022

I prefer reserving capacity and tracking the unplanned work in the backlog so the type and complexity of the unplanned work can be day-lighted. When more than 10-15% of a team's capacity is being spent on unplanned work, its imperative to identify root causes and start working those as items (quality; constant priority changes; technical debt; stakeholder misalignment; etc.). On large product delivery efforts, dedicating a team (or more) to ops may be of value, but this is a last resort from my perspective. In a value delivery system with dedicated ops teams, I recommend rotating/swapping an ops team and dev team member every so often so the nature of ops and dev work can be socialized across teams. I've found this team-member swapping can work in cases where the ops and dev work are wildly different or provided by different vendors etc. If the ops team is really just a dev team dedicated to ops issues, you might try rotating entire teams from dev to ops and ops to dev. Team rotation can help prevent code smells from from the "dev only" teams becoming the problem of the "ops only" teams. Just my 2 cents.


Paul Sorauer
11:36 am November 25, 2022

Unplanned work does happen but the question is whether it happens systemically or on an ad hoc basis.

Ad hoc is ok. Being Agile we should welcome change and we all know that business requirements change but there's an organisational problem if this happens frequently. Infrequent ad hoc change should be easy enough to cater for. Frequent ad hoc change is when the Scrum Master and / Agile Coach should step in and review the process with leadership.

That leaves systemic unplanned work. Personally I believe the only acceptable version of this is production support.

For a while I have advocated a cross-functional, DevOps oriented team, so the developers that write the product are the developers that support the product. My teams then take in Support Stories and as part of Sprint Planning, in consultation with the Scrum Master and the Product Owner, each Support Story is allocated the appropriate number of points based on both historical and predictive forecasting. For instance, if we've made a recent large production release, we may bump up the story points as we anticipate a greater than average number of support requests. As we gain greater confidence of the stability of the release 'in the wild' we will then reduce the point size back to normal.

This 'reserved' capacity is then drawn down during the sprint and as we near the end of the sprint or start to run out of work, we then start to release points from the Support Stories back a the 'pool' and then invite the development team to bring in a new story commensurate to what's in the pool.

This methodology has worked well in my teams as a way of planning unplanned work and most team members agree that's it's the best approach (that we've come up with).


Pietro Maffi
04:32 pm November 30, 2022

I like all the suggestion you provided here, except for "Cut the work smaller". I think this approach will bring to technical delivery and not to shippable product. The minimum work deliverable should be already defined during refinement and planning, going deeply will require more time to define the "smallest" amount of work deliverable and may leave open the door to technical delivery with no value to the customer. We should be able to deliver always value to the customer, and sometime saying no to interrupt can help the customer to understand better the value we are working on.


Bernice
09:58 pm September 23, 2025

You can also use Kanban to handle unplanned work. Here's how you can do it: https://kanbantool.com/blog/handling-unplanned-work-with-kanban